High Court of KeralaRPFC/332/2014dismissed as withdrawn

Ajikumar v. State Of Kerala

2015-03-24Honourable Mr.Justice C.T.Ravikumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/3RD CHAITHRA, 1937 RPFC.No. 332 of 2014 () ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER IN MC 521/2012 of FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD DATED 30-05-2014 REVISION PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT:

-------------------------------------------- AJIKUMAR, AGED 40 YEARS 5/367, PRASHANTH BHAVAN, KACHANI VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.SHAJIN S.HAMEED RESPONDENT(S)/STATE AND PETITIONERS:

----------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. MINI V.S, AGED 34 YEARS X/795, TPRA NO.D-5, REVATHI BHAVAN PULLIKONAM, KACHANI, KARAKULAM P.O.

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 564.

3. ASWANI AJIKUMAR, AGED 10 YEARS REPRESENTED BY MINI V.S (MOTHER), X/795, TPRA NO.D-5 REVATHI BHAVAN, PULLIKONAM, KACHANI KARAKULAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 564.

4. ABHIRAMI AJIKUMAR, AGED 7 YEARS REPRESENTED BY MINI V.S (MOTHER), X/795, TPRA NO.D-5 REVATHI BHAVAN, PULLIKONAM, KACHANI KARAKULAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 564. R2-R4 BY ADV. SRI.BASANT BALAJI R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.N.SURESH THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: dlk

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J --------------------------------------- R.P(F.C) No.332 of 2014 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of March, 2015

ORDER

This revision petition is filed against the order dated 30.5.2014 in M.C.No.521/2012 of the Family Court, Nedumangad. Earlier, the petitioner and respondents 2 to 4 were directed to attend for a mediation. Evidently, the matter has been successfully mediated and now, a Memorandum of Agreement under section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Rules 24 & 25 of the Civil Procedure (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Rules 2008 has been filed by the parties. Evidently, both the parties and also the learned counsel on both sides have duly verified the same. It is noticed. Going by Clause 2 therein the revision petitioner had agreed to withdraw this case. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties this revision petition may be permitted to be withdrawn. In the said circumstances, recording the agreement entered into between the parties which form part of this order, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this revision petition. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR,JUDGE.

dlk