← Library
High Court of KeralaRSA/440/2015dismissed

Chandrasekharan Nair v. Bharathi

2015-07-13Honourable Mr. Justice A.Hariprasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.HARIPRASAD MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2015/22ND ASHADHA, 1937 RSA.No. 440 of 2015 () ----------------------- AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN ASNO. 24/2012 of II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT,THODUPUZHA DATED 19-12-2014 AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN OS NO.209/2001 of MUNSIFF COURT,THODUPUZHA DATED 09-12-2011 APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:

---------------------------------------------------------------- CHANDRASEKHARAN NAIR, AGED 79 S/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, CHUNAYAMAKKAL HOUSE, (MAVELIL) MANAKKAD KARA, MANAKKAD VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK. BY ADVS.SRI.V.RAJENDRAN PERUMBAVOOR SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM SRI.N.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

--------------------------------------------------

1. BHARATHI, AGED ABOUT 66, W/O.BHASKARAN NAIR ,CHALAPPURATH HOUSE RESIDING AT VADOOR HOUSE, MANAKKAD KARA MANAKKAD VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, MANAKKAD P.O. 685 608.

2. BHASKARAN HUSBAND OF 1ST RESPONDENT, CHALAPPURATH HOUSE, RESIDING AT VADOOR HOUSE MANAKKAD KARA, MANAKKAD VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK (DIED) .

3. ANILKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 46 S/O.BHASKARAN NAIR, CHALAPPURATH HOUSE RESIDING AT VADOOR HOUSE, MANAKKAD KARA MANAKKAD VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, MANAKKAD P.O.685 608.

4. SUNILKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 44 S/O.BHASKARAN NAIR, CHALAPPURATH HOUSE RESIDING AT VADOOR HOUSE, MANAKKAD KARA MANAKKAD VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, MANAKKAD P.O.685 608.

R1 BY ADV. SRI..UNNIKRISHNAN.V.ALAPATT (CAVEATOR) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

A.HARIPRASAD, J.

-------------------------------------- R.S.A. No.440 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and respondents.

2.

The matter had been referred to mediation. The parties have lawfully settled the dispute in mediation. Memorandum of settlement under Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure is produced. The compromise arrived at by the parties is recorded. It shall form part of the judgment and decree of this Court. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.

All pending interlocutory applications will stand dismissed. A. HARIPRASAD, JUDGE.

cks