High Court of KeralaWP(C)/6066/2005closed

Rajendran B. v. Zonal Manager & Authorised Officer

2015-09-08Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/17TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 6066 of 2005 (V) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-----------------------

1. RAJENDRAN B., NETHAJI, THIRUMULLAVARAM P.O., KOLLAM-12.

2. MRS. INDIRA V., NETHAJI, THIRUMULLAVARAM P.O., KOLLAM-12.

3. SARAT RAJ, NETHAJI, THIRUMULLAVARAM P.O., KOLLAM-12.

BY ADV. SRI.S.R.AJITH RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. ZONAL MANAGER & AUTHORISED OFFICER, BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, KERALA ZONE, KALOOR TOWERS, KALOOR-KADAVANTHARA ROAD, ERNAKULAM.

2. CHIEF MANAGER & AUTHORISED OFFICER, BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, KERALA ZONE, KALOOR TOWERS, KALOOR-KADAVANTHRA ROAD, ERNAKULAM.

3. MANAGER, BANK OF INDIA, KOLLAM BRANCH, KOLLAM.

BY ADVS. SRI.M.P.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR (SR.) SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 6066 of 2005 (V) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

-------------------------------------- EXT.P1: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DTD.23.1.2004 ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER.

EXT.P2: TRUE COPIES OF REPRESENTATION DTD.16.004 AND 6.7.2004 SENT TO 1ST RESPONDENT BY PETITIONERS.

EXT.P3: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE DTD.19.10.2004 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT. EXT.P4: TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD.28.1.2005 SENT BY PETITIONERS TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J --------------------------------------------- WPC No.6066 of 2005 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

No representation for the petitioners.

The petitioners have not taken steps to issue notice to R2 and R3.

The interim order already granted was in force only for two weeks from 25.5.2005. Thereafter the interim order was not extended.

As it appears from record that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the matter, this writ petition is closed without examining the merits.

sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE css/ true copy P.S.TO JUDGE