Lakshmikutty v. Dhanalakshmi Bank Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/29TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 5884 of 2006 (A) --------------------------- OA. NO.91/2001 OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM. .........

PETITIONER(S):

--------------------------

1. U.S. LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA, PUSHPAMANGALAM, KUNDALASSERY P.O., KERALASSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

2. N.P. RAMAN NAIR, PUSHPAMANGALAM, KUNDALASSERY P.O. KERALASSERY, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.R.KRISHNA RAJ, SRI.A.SHANAVAS KHAN, SRI.P.R.HARIKUMAR, SMT.P.V.SOBHANA.

RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGER, KONGAD BRANCH, PALAKKAD.

BY ADV. SRI.V.A.AJAI KUMAR.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C).No.5884/2006 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated this the 19th Day of June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Considering the nature of the reliefs sought for in the writ petition, I am of the view that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ms \\True copy// P.S to Judge