Vijayakumar v. Anandan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/23RD MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 6336 of 2006 (D) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, AGD 42 YEARS, KAIPPILLI HOUSE, AYYAPPANKAVU P.O. KOZHUKULLY, NADATHARA, THRISSUR.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.A.SREEJITH SRI.P.V.SREENIVASAN SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. ANANDAN, S/O.GOVINDAN, EDATHALA HOUSE, KOZHUKULLY P.O. AMBALAMOOLA, NADATHARA.
2. THE SECRETARY, NADATHARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH, NADATHARA.
3. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KOZHUKULLY VILLAGE, KOZHUKULLY.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, THRISSUR,
5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, THRISSUR.
R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.C.C.THOMAS (SR.) R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI ABHIJITH LESSLI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: kkj
WP(C).No. 6336 of 2006 (D) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXT.P1:
TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION FILED BY MR.ACHUTHAN EXT.P2;
TRUE COPY OF DIRECTION ISSUED BY ADDL. TAHSILDAR TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.P3:
TRUE COPY OF THE MASS PETITION SUBMITTED BY THE FARMERS OF AYYAPPANKAVU KOLE TO THE CONCERNED AUTHORITIES ABOUT ILLEGAL FILING AND TRANSACTIONS EXT.P4:
TRUE COPY OF THE INTIMATION OF PERSONAL HEARING ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER RESPOONDENTS' EXHIBITS EXT.R1(A):
PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION SUBMITTED BY ONE ACHUTHAN BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED NIL EXT.R1(B):
PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION DATED 03.03.2006 SUBMITTED BY ONE P.C.GEORGE & ARAVINDAKSHAN BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.R1(C):
PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITION DATED NIL SUBMITTED BY ONE K.RAMDAS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXT.R1(D);
PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 1.7.2006 SENT BY THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, NADATHARA TO THE PRESIDENT OF NADATHARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH EXT.R1(E):
PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER DATED 27.06.2006 SUBMITTED BY THE SECRETARY, KOZHUKULLY PADASEKHARAM TO THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER, NADATHARA // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J.
--------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.6336 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the day of February, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The counsel for the petitioner submits that, since the reliefs sought for in W.P.(C) No.6738 of 2006, the connected writ petition are sufficient, this writ petition is unnecessary. Therefore, without prejudice to the contentions of the petitioner in the said writ petition, this writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/- K.SURENDRA MOHAN, JUDGE kkj