← Library
High Court of KeralaWA/1129/2013dismissed as not pressed

P.B.Sugatha Kumar v. Dr.Rajumon T.

2015-02-06Honourable Mr. Justice Alexander Thomas,Honourable Mr.Justice Antony Dominic2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/17TH MAGHA, 1936 WA.No. 1129 of 2013 () IN WP(C).20354/2012 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 20354/2012 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 10-06-2013 APPELLANT(S)/5TH RESPONDENT:

---------------------------------------------------- P.B.SUGATHA KUMAR 'SUBEENA' KRA-73, BANK ROAD, ANAYARA P.O THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695029 FORMER M.D.RUTRONIX. BY ADVS.SRI.C.P.SUDHAKARA PRASAD (SR.) SRI.S.RAMESH SRI.NAVEEN.T SMT.POOJA SURENDRAN RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4: ----------------------------

1. DR.RAJUMON T. MAVUNKAL, AGED 46 YEARS S/O.M.J.TOM, MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE RURAL WOMEN'S ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE FEDERATION LTD SASTHAMANGALAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (EARLIER WORKING AS ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ST XAVIER'S COLLEGE, VAIKOM, KOTTAYAM).

2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695001.

3. THE SECRETARY, (SPECIAL) INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, STATE OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695001.

4. JOINT SECRETARY (INDUSTRIES DEPT) GOVERNMENT OF KERALA SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695001.

5. THE SECRETARY, KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695001.

R1 BY SRI.BENNY GERVACIS BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM BY SRI.R.S.HARI KUMAR ,SC,KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

ANTONY DOMINIC & ALEXANDER THOMAS, JJ.

=============================== Writ Appeal No. 1129 of 2013 ===================== Dated this the 6th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Antony Dominic, J.

When the case was taken up, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant is not pressing the writ appeal. Hence, the writ appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE Sd/- ALEXANDER THOMAS JUDGE Rp //True Copy// PA to Judge