P.Madhavi v. The Taliparamba Muncipality
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/26TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 6940 of 2005 (A) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
1. P.MADHAVI, W/O.LATE P.T.KUNHAMBU, THALAVIL, PARASSINIKKADAVU, KANNUR DISTRICT.
2. DR.LAKSHMANAN, PRINCIPAL SCIENTIST, CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF FISHERIES TECHNOLOGY, MALSYAPURI, COCHIN-29.
BY ADVS.SRI.GOVIND K.BHARATHAN (SR.) SRI.MANU MOHAN RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. THE THALIPARAMBA MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, THALIPARAMBA.
2. THE CHAIRMAN, TALIPARAMBA MUNICIPALITY, TALIPARAMBA.
3. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/
WP(C).No. 6940 of 2005 (A) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
-------------------------------------- EXT.P1A: PHOTOCOPY OF A REPRESENTATION SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT CHAIRMAN OF THE MUNICIPALITY.
EXT.P1B: PHOTOCOPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD OF EXHIBIT P1A REPRESENTATION.
EXT.P2: PHOTOCOPY OF A ROUGH PLAN NOT TO SCALE SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THEIR PROPERTIES AND THE NEW ALIGNMENT OF THE ROAD. EXT.P3A: PHOTOGRAPH TO SHOW THE 4 FOOT HIGH WALL ON TOP OF THE ROAD IS CONSTRUCTED.
EXT.P3B: PHOTOGRAPH TO SHOW THE 4 FOOT HIGH WALL ON TOP OF THE ROAD IS CONSTRUCTED.
EXTP4: PHOTOCOPY OF REMINDER DTD.29.9.2004 SENT BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/
A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 6940 of 2005 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of November, 2015
J U D G M E N T
No representation for the petitioners. The matter stands posted for orders. The petitioners have not cured the defect in completing service against the respondents. As it appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/17.11.2015