Ratheesh K.S. v. Sreedevi G.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/21ST ASWINA, 1937 Tr.P(C).No. 350 of 2015 ------------------------------- OP 253/2014 AND OP 255/2014 OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA ........

PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDENT:

-------------------------------------------- RATHEESH K.S., AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. SATHYA DEVAN, KUNNATHULLY VEEDU, PUTHUSSERRY WEST VILLAGE, PALAKKAD DIST - 678 623. BY ADVS.SRI.RENJITH B.MARAR SMT.LAKSHMI.N.KAIMAL SMT.RESHMI JACOB SMT.B.DEEPALAKSHMI RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:

-------------------------------------------- SREEDEVI G., AGED 28 YEARS, D/O. GOPINATH, NADAVILEDATHU VEEDU, RAMAMANGLAM KARAYIL, MARADI VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DIST - 686 673.

BY ADV. SRI.C.DILIP THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-10-2015, ALONG WITH TPC. 353/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

msv/

Tr.P(C).No. 350 of 2015 ------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A1: TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION NUMBERED AS OP 253/2014 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.

ANNEXURE A2: TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION NUMBERED AS OP.255/2014 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA.

ANNEXURE A3: TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PETITION NUMBERED AS OP.431/2015 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:

NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

--------------------------------------- Tr.P.(C) Nos.350 & 353 of 2015 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of October, 2015 COMMON ORDER Petitioner is the husband of the respondent, who has filed O.P.No.253 of 2014 and 255 of 2014 in Family Court, Muvattupuzha. The prayer of the respondent is to transfer them to Family Court, Palakkad.

2.

Heard.

3.

The respondent resides at Maradi near Muvattupuzha and the petitioner at Puthusserry in Palakkad District. He works at Thrissur. From Thrissur the distance is almost same to Palakkad and Muvattupuzha though they are in the opposite direction. I do not find any reason to transfer the petitions to Family Court, Palakkad. In the result, these petitions are dismissed. K.ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE pm