Roshini Krishna v. General Convener

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 WA.No. 94 of 2015 () IN WP(C).34593/2014 ------------------------------------------ AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 34593/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 07-01-2015 .....

APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER:

---------------------------------------------- ROSHINI KRISHNA, AGED 17 YEARS D/O.KRISHNA, CHAKKUMCHATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE MANGALAM, WADAKKANCHERY P.O., THRISSUR 680 623 REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN AND MOTHER BINDU C.R., MANGALAM, WADAKKANCHERY P.O., THRISSUR 680 623.

BY ADV. SMT.MARY BEENA JOSEPH RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------------------------------

1. GENERAL CONVENER STATE YOUTH FESTIVAL, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001

2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR 680 001

3. ASSISTANT EDUCATION OFFICER, CHAVAKKAD, THRISSUR 680 506

4. CHAIRMAN, APPEAL COMMITTEE CHAVAKKAD SUB DISTRICT KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM THRISSUR 680 001 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R. SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

OKB

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN & K.HARILAL, JJ.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Writ Appeal No.94 of 2015 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Dated this the 16th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.

We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Senior Government Pleader.

2. The appellant lost the writ petition before the learned single Judge. The plea was that the writ petitioner's team was entitled to be ranked first in the 'Thiruvathirakali' competition in connection with the Revenue Jilla Kalolsavam. The learned single Judge noted that the appeal was considered by the competent body and that there was a difference of 7.5 marks between the petitioner's team and the first place winner. No error of procedure was found by the learned single Judge. There is no illegality pointed out warranting interference under Article 227 of the Constitution. We see no ground to interfere in this writ appeal either. This writ appeal fails.

In the result, this writ appeal is dismissed. Sd/- THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE Sd/- K.HARILAL, JUDGE okb.