Sujeesh v. The Kavanoor Grama Panchayat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/22ND MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1116 of 2012 (L) --------------------------- PETITIONER -------------------------- SUJEESH, AGED 24 YEARS ANDIKKADAN HOUSE, KOOTTILANGADI, KOOTILANGADI.P.O. PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.GILBERT GEORGE CORREYA SRI.ALAN PAPALI RESPONDENT(S):
---------------------------- THE KAVANOOR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KAVANOOR.P.O.-673 644 VIA.AREACODE, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
R BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 1116 of 2012 (L) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE LICENCE NO.M-88/2011-2012 DATED 05.01.2012 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, MALAPPURAM.
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.177/12 DATED 10.01.2012 ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE RESPONDENT GRAMA PANCHAYAT.
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THE RENT DEED DATED 10.01.2012 EXECUTED BETWEEN K.UNNIKUTTY, K.REMANKUTTY AND THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR LICENCE SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT ALONG WITH THE RECEIPT NO.190/12 DATED 11.01.2012.
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR LICENCE TO SELL, STOCK & EXHIBIT FOR SALE AND DISTRIBUTE FOOD, SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED NIL.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE SMM
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI,J ................................................. . W.P.C. No.1116 of 2012 .............................................. Dated this the 11th day of February,2015.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has come up before this Court on the alleged refusal of the respondent to accept the application filed by the petitioner for renewal of license for the period 2011-12.
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that subsequently license has been issued. As there is no surviving cause of action, the Writ Petition is closed without examining the merits.
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE smm