Lijo M. Jacob v. Aneeshmol

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/17TH ASWINA, 1937 Tr.P(C).No. 566 of 2014 ------------------------------- OP 984/2013 OF FAMILY COURT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM --------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- LIJO M. JACOB, S/O JACOB VARGHESE, CHARUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, VALAKODE P.O, VALAKODE VILLAGE, PUNALUR, KOLLAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.B.MOHANLAL SRI.A.SANIL KUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------ ANEESHMOL, D/O KUNJUMOL, MARAMKODE PUTHEN VEEDU, VALAKODE P.O VALAKODE VILLAGE, PUNALUR, KOLLAM 681331.

BY ADVS. SRI.MANOJ RAMASWAMY SMT.SANJANA R.NAIR THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

Tr.P(C).No. 566 of 2014 ------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES --------------------------------------- A1:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 21/2/12 IN OP.(DIV.)NO.698/11 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOTTARAKKARA A2:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 5/9/14 IN WPC.(CRL.)NO.360/14 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

A3:

THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE RECEIVED TO THE PETITIONER FROM FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM IN OP.984/13. RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURS ---------------------------------------- R1(A): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE PETITON IN OP.94/14 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM R1(B): TRUE COPY OF THE B-DIARY IN OP.984 OF 2013 OF FAMILY COURT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM R1(C): TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 27/6/13. / TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Tr.P.(C).No.566 OF 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 9th day of October, 2015

O R D E R

Petitioner is the husband of the respondent. The latter has filed O.P.No.984 of 2013 Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner wants to get the O.P transfered to Family Court, Kottarakara.

2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioner works at Nagpur in Maharashtra. The respondent works at Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner was set ex parte. Without taking part in the proceedings he has filed this transfer petition. There is no justification for granting his prayer.

In the result, this transfer petition is dismissed. sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge