High Court of KeralaTr.P(C)/684/2014allowed

Reshmiraj v. Sujith Gopal

2015-04-01Honourable Mr.Justice P.Bhavadasan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.BHAVADASAN WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2015/11TH CHAITHRA, 1937 Tr.P(C).No. 684 of 2014 () --------------------------- FOR TRANSFER OF OP(HMA) 1057/2014 FROM FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD TO FAMILY COURT, ATTINGAL.

PETITIONER(S)/RESPONDEDNT:

--------------------------- RESHMIRAJ, AGED 25 YEARS,D/O.RAJAN PILLAI, RESIDING AT MAKAYERAM, ELAPPURAM P.O., KEEZHATTINGAL DESOM AND VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.M.DINESH RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER:

------------------------- SUJITH GOPAL, S/O.VENUGOPALAN NAIR, AGED 30 YEARS, SREECHAKRA, LAKSHMIPURAM, SANTHIGIRI P.O., POOLAMTHARA, KOLIYAKODE VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT 695 589.

THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

P. BHAVADASAN, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Tr.P.(C). No. 684 of 2014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 1st day of April, 2015.

ORDER

This is a petition filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure to have O.P.(HMA) 1057 of 2014 pending before Family Court, Nedumangad transferred to Family Court, Attingal.

2. Suffice to say, the marital relationship between the petitioner and the respondent ran into rough weather and that gave rise to litigations. The petitioner makes mention of various articles given at the time of marriage and the petitioner filed O.P.1124 of 2014 before Family Court, Attingal for return of the article. According to the petitioner, as a retaliatory measure, the respondent instituted O.P.(HMA) 1057 of 2014 before Family Court, Nedumangad for dissolution of marriage.

3. The petitioner points out that she is a resident of Attingal and she finds it extremely difficult to go over to

Tr.P.(C).684/2014.

Nedumangad to attend the court on all posting dates. It is also pointed out that she is not financially very sound and there is nobody to accompany her to Nedumangad. Since the petition filed by the petitioner is pending before Family Court, Attingal, she prays that it is only appropriate that the same court considers and disposes of both the matters.

4. Though the respondent has been served with notice, there is no appearance on his behalf. Since there is no objection to the prayer for transfer, this petition is allowed and O.P. (HMA) 1057 of 2014 pending before Family Court, Nedumangad shall stand transferred to Family Court, Attingal.

P. BHAVADASAN, JUDGE sb.