P.S.Sajimon v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/17TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WA.No. 757 of 2015 () IN WP(C).33368/2014 ------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 33368/2014 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 19-12-2014 APPELLANT(S):/PETITIONER ------------------------ P.S.SAJIMON, S/O.P.D.SUKUMARAN, PUTHANPARAMBIL HOUSE, KALLARA P.O., KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSY ANTONY RESPONDENT(S):/RESPONDENTS ---------------------------- 1.
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2.
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PALA.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, VAIKOM.
4.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOTTAYAM.
5.
THE APPELLATE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER-1, COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOTTAYAM.
BY SRI.LIJU V.STEPHEN, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & K.HARILAL, JJ.
.................................................................... W.A.No.757 of 2015 and C.M.Appl.No.418 of 2015 .................................................................... Dated this the 7th day of April, 2015.
J U D G M E N T
Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.
1.This writ appeal comes up with an application seeking condonation of delay of 23 days in its institution. 2.We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Government Pleader.
3.Issue relates to non-payment of outstanding due under the Kerala Legal Benefit Fund for entertaining the appeals and the revisions filed by the appellant/petitioner. The learned single Judge noted an earlier round of litigation and also the fact that the time extension granted even in that proceedings was not adhered to. Under such circumstances, we do not find that the learned single
WA757/15 -2Judge was unjustified in dismissing the writ petition. This writ appeal, therefore, fails.
In the result, the C.M.Application and the writ appeal are dismissed.
(THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE) (K.HARILAL, JUDGE) jg