← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1301/2013dismissed as infructuous

P.N. Krishnadas v. The District Collector

2015-07-17Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU FRIDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JULY 2015/26TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 1301 of 2013 (K) --------------------------- PETITIONERS:

---------------

1. P.N. KRISHNADAS, AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, POLAKKULATH TOURIST HOME, NARAYANAMANGALAM, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

2. P.N.KRISHNALAL, MANAGING PARTNER, POLAKKULATH TOURIST HOME, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR, DISTRICT.

3. V R SAJEEVAN, MANAGING PARTNER, HOTEL ASWATHY, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

4. P B PREMDAS, MANAGING PARTNER, HOTEL INDRAPRASTHAM, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

5. P S SREEKANTAN, PROPRIETOR, HOTEL PRASASTHI, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

6. C K UMESH, PROPRIETOR, HOTEL PALACE & PARADISE, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

7. N.M.KARTHIKEYAN PROPRIETOR, HOTEL SINDHU BAR, KODUNGALLUR THRISSUR DISTRICT.

8. SHAJU A ANTONY, MANAGING PARTNER, HOTEL KAIRALI, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

9. K V SADANANDAN, MANAGING PARTNER, HOTEL ELITE DRIVE INN, KODUNGALLUR, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.N.RAGHURAJ SMT.K.AMMINIKUTTY

W.P.(C) No. 1301/2013 : 2 :

RESPONDENTS:

-----------------

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 001.

2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THRISSUR - 680 001.

3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE , THRISSUR - 680 001.

4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, KODUNGALLUR , THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 003.

5. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

R BY SRI. G. GOPAKUMAR, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

---------------------------------- W.P. (C) No. 1301 of 2013 (K) ---------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of July, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that nothing survives in the writ petition and hence it has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, this Court dismisses the writ petition as infructuous.

sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

/True Copy/ P.A to Judge.

rv

W.P.(Crl.)/W.A. No.

-2-