High Court of KeralaWP(C)/2456/2012dismissed as withdrawn

Shajan Cyril Fernandez v. The Kannur District Co-Operative Bank

2015-07-06Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JULY 2015/15TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 2456 of 2012 (F) PETITIONERS:

1. SHAJAN CYRIL FERNANDEZ, CLERK, EVENING BRANCH, KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, RESIDING AT 'SHAJAN VILLA', MARAKKARKANDY, THAYYIL P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT.

2. ROOPESH C.

SREEKANDAPURAM EVENING BRANCH, KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, RESIDING AT CHALADAN HOUSE, VALAKKAI, KOYYAM P.O. KANNUR DISTRICT.

3. AJAYAN K.K.

MAIN BRANCH, KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, RESIDING AT KOVVAL KUNDATHIL HOUSE, PARASSINIKADAVU P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT.

4. GEETHA K.K.

CLERK, KUTHUPARAMBA BRANCH, KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, RESIDING AT 'ASHTAPADI', P.O.KOTTAYAM MALABAR KUTHUPARAMBA, KANNUR DISTICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.SASINDRAN SRI.V.VENUGOPAL RESPONDENTS:

1. THE KANNUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK, KANNUR-670 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER.

2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KANNUR-670 001.

3. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

4. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

W.P.(C) No. 2456/2012 : 2 :

ADDL. R5 IMPLEADED:

5. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

(ADDL. R5 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 03.07.2015 IN I.A. NO. 9322/2015.) R2,R3 & 4 BY ADV. SRI. D. SOMASUNDARAM, SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER RR1 BY ADV. SMT.M.MEENA JOHN R BY STATE ATTORNEY SRI. VIJAYARAGHAVAN R BY SRI.P.NARAYANAN,SC,KANNUR DIST.CO.OPERATIVE BANK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

---------------------------------- W.P. (C) No. 2456 of 2012 ---------------------------------- Dated this the 6th day of July, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to agitate the issue, if fresh cause of action arises. Leave granted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that if the petitioners have any fresh cause of action at any point of time, they are at liberty to lay proper challenge concerning the same.

sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.

/True Copy/ P.A to Judge.

W.P.(Crl.)/W.A. No.

-2-