Janaka Jebangelin v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2015/23RD ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 1403 of 2013 (A) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- JANAKA JEBANGELIN W/O K.MANIKANDAN, M.J.BHAVAN, KANNUMAMOODU POST PALUGAL VILLAGE, KANYAKUMARI DISRICT, TAMIL NADU. BY ADV. SRI.DEEPU THANKAN RESPONDENTS:

------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN:695 101.

2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN:695 101.

3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 101.

4. TOMIN J.THACHANGARI INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HED QUARTERS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 101.

R1 -R 3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. V.H. JASMINE R4 BY ADV. SRI.O.V.RADHAKRISHNAN (SR.) R4 BY ADV. SMT.K.RADHAMANI AMMA R4 BY ADV. SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

W.P.(C) No.1403/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS P1 COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 23.11.2010 EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER'S HUSBAND AND 4TH RESPONDENT P2 COPY OF THE FIR NO.346/2011 OF NORTH PARUR POLICE STATION P3 COPY OF THE FIR NO.549/2011 OF VARAPUZHA POLICE STATION P4 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 04.01.2013 TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT P5 COPY OF THE DETAILS REGARDING SHAREHOLDING AND DIRECTORS OF M/S.APG DEVELOPERS (P) LTD OBTAINED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE SD

P. UBAID, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.1403 of 2013 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 14th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

This writ petition need not continue in view of the writ petition filed by the aggrieved person himself as W.P.(C) No.19163/2015. Competence of the writ petitioner herein was seriously raised by the other side, and now there is a proper writ petition by the aggrieved person.

In the above circumstance, this writ petition is closed. However, the confidential reports produced by the respondents in two sealed covers will form part of the records in W.P.(C) No.19163/2015. Those reports will be considered for disposal of the writ petition, filed by the aggrieved person. Sd/- P. UBAID, JUDGE sd