← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1764/2011dismissed for default

Ponnappan v. State Of Kerala

2015-12-10Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/19TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 1764 of 2011 (U) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONERS:

1. PONNAPPAN, AGED 42, S/O. RAGHAVAN, PUTHUKKATTU VEEDU, PALLIPURAM.

2. PAVITHRAN, AGED 45, S/O. MADHAVAN, PUTHEVELI VEEDU, THAYKKATTUSSERY, CHERTHALA.

3. JAYACHANDRAN, AGED 46, S/O. RAGHAVAN, UDAYA MANDIRAM, THAYKKATTUSEERY, CHERTHALA.

4. SUBHADRAN, AGED 45, S/O. DIVAKARAN, KARTHIYAYANI MANDHIRAM, VARANADU.P.O

5. K.R.ASHOKAN, AGED 47, S/O. RAGHAVAN, KOTTAPARAMBIL CHIRAYIL VEEDU, THYKKATTUSSERY, CHERTHALA.

BY ADV. SRI.C.P.UDAYABHANU RESPONDENTS:

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY, TAX (A) DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KERALA, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, ALAPPUZHA - 688 001.

4. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR, EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, CHERTHALA, CHERTHALA.P.O. - 688 524.

5. THE DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, MAIN CAMPUS, VELLAYANIKKARA, KAU.P.O, PIN - 680 656 THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-12-2015,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.

------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.1764 of 2011 U -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

None appears for the petitioners. Despite the fact that the writ petition belongs to the year 2011 and that well in advance this Court has notified that the matter would be taken up today, the petitioners have not chosen to appear before the Court to prosecute the case. This Court accordingly holds that the petitioners may not be inclined to pursue the writ petition. As a result, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge tkv