← Library
High Court of KeralaWA/1980/2015dismissed

Ramdas v. The Authorized Officer

2015-09-17Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/26TH BHADRA, 1937 WA.No. 1980 of 2015 IN WP(C).20245/2015 -------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 20245/2015 DATED 06-07-2015 .......................

APPELLANT/PETITIONER :

----------------------------- RAMDAS S/O. SMT.VILASINI AMMA, VILAKKATHARA HOUSE THRISSUR DESOM, THRISSUR VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.A.N.SATHISH KUMAR RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS :

--------------------------------------

1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER THRISSUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD, HEAD OFFICE SHAHAKARANA SATHABDI MANDIRAM, KOVILAKATHUPADAM THRISSUR - 680 022.

2. THE MANAGER THRISUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD PUDUKKAD BRANCH, PUDUKKAD THRISSUR DISTRICT - 680 022.

BY SRI.C.A.MAJEED, SC, THRISSUR DISTRICT CO.OP. BANK THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Ashok Bhushan, C.J. & K. Vinod Chandran, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.A. No. 1980 OF 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ashok Bhushan, C.J.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. This writ appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 06.07.2015 passed in W.P.(C) No.20245 of 2015 by which the petitioner has prayed for quashing of Ext.P1 notice issued by the Bank under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

3. The petitioner had earlier filed a writ petition, W.P.(C) No. 21253 of 2014, which was disposed of by judgment dated 14.08.2014 permitting the petitioner to deposit the entire arrears in six installments. Petitioner did not comply with the said order and filed the present writ petition which was dismissed giving liberty to the petitioner to move an application in W.P.(C) No.21253 of 2014. Instead of moving

WA No. 1980 of 2015 -:2:- such application, the petitioner has come up with this writ petition. We are of the view that the learned Single Judge has rightly dismissed the writ petition with the liberty aforesaid. If so advised, the petitioner may make appropriate application as permitted by learned Single Judge.

With the above observation, the Writ Appeal is dismissed.

Ashok Bhushan, Chief Justice.

K. Vinod Chandran, Judge.

ttb/17/09