← Library
High Court of KeralaWA/1519/2014dismissed

T.M.Pappachan v. The Secretary

2015-06-04Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon,Honourable Mr. Justice Babu Mathew P.Joseph2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/14TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WA.No. 1519 of 2014 (V) IN WP(C).5979/2010 -------------------------------------------- (AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 5979/2010 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 11-04-2014) APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN WPC:

--------------------------------- T.M.PAPPACHAN AGED 74 YEARS S/O.MATHEW, KONIL HOUSE, OLASSA P.O, AYMANAM VILLAGE, KOTTAYAM KOTTAYAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.B.RAJEEV KOYICKAL RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WPC:

---------------------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY AYMANAM VILLAGE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDNO 750 AYMANAM, OLASSA P.O, KOTTAYAM TALUK KOTTAYAM 15

2. THE ASST.REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL), KOTTAYAM 1

3. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER PUTHUPPALLY ADHYAPAKA CO-OPERATIVE BANK GROUP KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM 15

4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER KOTTAYAM DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD KOTTAYAM P.O, KOTTAYAM 1

5. THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT MANAGER NABARD, PARK LANE, NEAR ST.PIOUS XTH CONVENT HOSPITAL KOTTAYAM 1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR. P.M. SAHEER BY SRI.T.A.SHAJI (SR.) BY SRI.SUNIL CYRIAC,SC,DIST.CO-OPERATIVE BANK,KOTTAYAM THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON & BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, JJ.

.............................................................................. W.A.No.1519 OF 2014 AND C.M. APPLN. No. 826 OF 2014 ......................................................................... Dated this the 4th June, 2015

J U D G M E N T

P.R. Ramachandra Menon, J:

This appeal has been preferred along with C.M.Application No. 826 of 2014. Notice was ordered in the C.M.Application to condone the delay of 154 days on 31.10.2014. No process charge was remitted, when it was listed before this Court on 29.05.2015. It was adjourned on that day and subsequently it was posted in the defect list . No process has been paid so far. There is no representation as well. It appears that the appellant has lost interest in the cause of action projected in the writ appeal. Accordingly this C.M.Application is dismissed for non-prosecution. As a natural consequence, the writ appeal is also dismissed for non-prosecution. P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, JUDGE.

lk