High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1937/2013closed

M.P.Hamsa v. Port Conservator

2015-03-13Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/22ND PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1937 of 2013 (N) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- M.P.HAMSA AGED 55 YEARS S/O.MOIDEEN, PUTHIYAVEETTIL, AZHIKODE KONDUNGALLUR.

BY ADVS.SRI.BABU KARUKAPADATH SMT.M.A.VAHEEDA BABU SRI.JAGAN ABRAHAM.M. GEORGE SRI.K.A.NOUSHAD SRI.P.U.VINOD KUMAR SRI.P.G.PRAMOD SRI RAHUL .KANDAMPULLY RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. PORT CONSERVATOR, POST OFFICE, KODUNGALLUR/MUNAMBAM AZHIKODE JETTY P.O. - 680 666.

2. MUSRIS BEACH FEST CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE, AZHIKODE, KODUNGALLUR - 680 666 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, MR.V.S.SUNIL KUMAR.

3. MR.E.V.RAMESAN, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, EDAMUTTATHU HOUSE, CONVENOR MUSRIS BEACH FEST CO-ORDINATION COMMITTEE, AZHIKODE KODUNGALLUR - 680 666.

4. V.M.A SHAMEER, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O.ABDUL KAREEM, VALIYARA HOUSE, PEYBAZAR ERIYAD P.O., KODUNGALLUR - 680 666.

R4 BY ADV. SRI.A.RANJITH NARAYANAN R4 BY ADV. SRI.S.K.SAJU R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-032015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 1937 of 2013 (N) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE LICENCE DATED 15-12-2012 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE SMM

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI,J ................................................. . W.P.C. No. 1937 of 2013 .............................................. Dated this the 13th day of March ,2015.

J U D G M E N T

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the validity of the petitioner's license was only upto 2-11-2014, which was seen subsequently extended. As there arose a similar issue in respect of the same subject matter, the petitioner has approached this Court with another writ petition.

As far as the period relating to this issue is over, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this petition can be closed. Hence this petition is closed leaving open the petitioner's right to be decided in the other writ petition.

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE smm