← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/2093/2013disposed of

Chirayinkeezhu Service Co-Operative Bank v. Joint Registrar Of Co-Operative Bank

2015-05-28Honourable Smt. Justice P.V.Asha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MAY 2015/7TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 2093 of 2013 (J) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- CHIRAYINKEEZHU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO 1155, REPRESENTED BY PRESIDENT, CHIRAYINKEEZHU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADVS.SRI.P.N.MOHANAN SMT.I.VINAYAKUMARI RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES(GENERAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 2093 of 2013 APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1:COPY OF THE POSTS SANCTION ORDER DATED 20.12.2006. EXT.P2:COPY OF THE AUDIT CERTIFICATE OF THE YEAR 2007-2008. EXT.P3:COPY OF THE AUDIT CERTIFICATE OF THE YEAR 2008-2009. EXT.P4: COPY OF THE AUDIT CERTIFICATE OF THE YEAR 2009-2010. EXT.P5:COPY OF THE AUDIT CERTIFICATE OF THE YEAR 2010-2011. EXT.P6:COPY OF THE ENQUIRY ORDERED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR DATED 15.12.2012.

EXT.P7:COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 20.8.2011 IN W.P.(C).NO.18218/2011. RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL -------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE SKV

P.V.ASHA, J.

=================== W.P.(C). No.2093 OF 2013 ======================= Dated this the 28th day of May, 2015

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is challenging the proceedings under Ext.P6 by which the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies had ordered an enquiry under Section 65.

2.

It is admitted on both sides that the committee which was in power at the relevant time has completed its term and a new committee has already taken charge.

3.

The petitioner has raised serious contentions against Ext.P6. Now that the enquiry did not proceed any further, as this court granted an interim stay and the committee has completed its tenure, I do not think any further grievance subsists for the petitioner as at present.

Therefore this writ petition is disposed of making it clear that the petitioner will be free to take up all the contentions raised in the writ petition, in case it becomes necessary at any stage in future.

With the above observation this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- P.V. ASHA, JUDGE SKV