← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/2299/2013closed

P.K. Jaleel v. The Kerala State Wakf Board

2015-02-04Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/15TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 2299 of 2013 (J) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- P.K. JALEEL, S/O.P.V.KUNJU MOHAMMED, AGED 50 YEARS, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, ERNAKULAM, (UNDER ORDER OF TRANSFER TO REGIONAL OFFICE, KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, KOZHIKODE.

BY ADVS.SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED SRI. M. SAJJAD RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, HEAD OFFICE, ERNAKULAM, (REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)-682017.

2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, ERNAKULAM-682017.

3. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

R1 & R2 BY SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA, SC R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 2299 of 2013 (J) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE TRANSFER ORDER NO.C4-232/2013 DATED 17-1-2013.

EXHIBIT P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE BOARD'S DECISION DATED 15-1-2013 SIGNED BY CHAIR PERSON, KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, ERNAKULAM. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY ISSUED BY DR.JOSE CHACKO PERIAPPURAM, CONSULTANT CARDIAC SURGEON & HOD, LISIE HOSPITAL, ERNAKULAM.

EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF FAMILY COURT, THRISSUR DATED 28-2-2008.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 2299 of 2013 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Heard both sides.

2.

The matter relates to the transfer of the petitioner.

3.

When the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition can be closed permitting the petitioner to ventilate his subsisting grievance before the respondents or in appropriate proceedings.

Recording the submission, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, JUDGE bka/-