← Library
High Court of KeralaWA/2635/2015dismissed

Dileepan v. The Authorised Officer, Syndicate Bank

2015-12-04Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WA.No. 2635 of 2015 () -------------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.2096/2014 DATED 22-01-2014. .......

APPELLANT(S):

------------------------ DILEEPAN. K., S/O.KUNJIRAMAN, UPASANA, CHETHADY, MELILA VILLAGE, CHENGAMMANAD. P.O., KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, THE SYNDICATE BANK, REGIONAL OFFICE, SASTHAMANGALAM. P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 010.

2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE SYNDICATE BANK, KOTTARAKARA BRANCH, KOTTARAKKARA. P.O., KOLLAM-691 506.

BY ADV. SRI.R.S. KALKURA, SC.

THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WA.No. 2635 of 2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:- ANNEXURE A1 COPY OF THE ACCOUNT STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN ACCOUNT NO.45078250006535.

ANNEXURE A2 COPY OF THE ACCOUNT STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN ACCOUNT NO.45071250000402.

ANNEXURE A3 COPY OF THE ACCOUNT STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN ACCOUNT NO.4507171000011.

ANNEXURE A4 COPY OF THE ACCOUNT STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN ACCOUNT NO.45077220006805.

ANNEXURE A5 COPY OF THE ACCOUNT STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN ACCOUNT NO.45077210000885.

ANNEXURE A6 COPY OF THE ACCOUNT STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN ACCOUNT NO.45077510000698.

ANNEXURE A7 COPY OF THE ACCOUNT STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN ACCOUNT NO.45077510000679.

ANNEXURE A8 COPY OF THE ACCOUNT STATEMENT ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT IN ACCOUNT NO.45078540000776.

ANNEXURE A9 COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 23/02/2015 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MELILA AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION. ANNEXURE A10 COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 11/09/2015 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MELILA AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION. ANNEXURE A11 COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 19/05/2015 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MELILA AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION. ANNEXURE A12 COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 22/06/2015 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MELILA AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION. ANNEXURE A13 COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 02/05/2015 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MELILA AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION. ANNEXURE A14 COPY OF THE REMITTANCES DATED 29/04/2015 AND 09/06/2015 TO THE RESPONDENTS.

.....2/-

WA.No. 2635 of 2015 ANNEXURE A15 COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 17/11/2015 ISSUED BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER AS PER THE ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, KOLLAM IN CMP. NO.8946/2013.

RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE rs.

ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.

---------------------------------------- W.A. No.2635 of 2015 and C.M. Appln. No.1442 of 2015 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of December 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J.

C.M.Appln. No.1442 of 2015 is an application seeking to condone the delay of 648 days in filing the above writ appeal. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above petition that the judgment was delivered on 22.1.2014, by which, the learned Single Judge had directed payment of overdue amount in four equal monthly instalments starting from 28.2.2014. Later, an application has been filed as I.A. No.6508 of 2014 seeking for extension of time, which was dismissed on 30.5.2014. 2.

The petitioner submits that he was remitting the monthly instalments to the respondents, but on account of huge financial difficulties from January, 2015, the payment could not be made. Though such facts had been stated in the affidavit, no specific reason has been stated for condoning the delay in filing the writ appeal.

W.A. No.2635 of 2015 and C.M. Appln. No.1442 of 2015 -: 2 :- 3.

We are of the view that sufficient cause has not been shown in the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation petition for condoning the delay. Hence, the delay condonation petition is dismissed.

Consequently, the writ appeal is also dismissed. Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE J UDGE Jvt/5.12.2015.