High Court of KeralaWP(C)/2581/2013disposed of

Malabar Distillery Employees Association v. State Of Kerala

2015-10-05Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/13TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 2581 of 2013 (W) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- MALABAR DISTILLERY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION MENONPARA P.O., PALAKKAD - 678 556 PRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY K.SURESH AGE 45 YEARS S/O.KUNJAN.

BY ADV. SRI.M.KRISHNAKUMAR RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT TAXES DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KERALA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. THE COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

4. THE KERALA STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1,R2,R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. A.LOWSY R4 BY ADV. SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH,SC,BEVERAGES CORPORATION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 2581 of 2013 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS EXHIBIT-P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 27-3-2008 EXHIBIT-P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 30-10-2008 EXHIBIT-P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19-11-2009 PASSED BY THE DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES EXHIBIT-P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 5-4-2010 EXHIBIT-P5 - TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER DATED 6-3-2010 EXHIBIT-P6 - TRUE COPY OF THE GOVT. ORDER DATED 6-5-2010 EXHIBIT-P7 - TRUE COPY OF THE GOVT. ORDER DATED 5-3-2010 EXHIBIT-P8 - TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 23-5-2012 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 2581 of 2013 (W) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner's grievance is that Ext.P8 representation dated 23.05.2012 has not been considered. The representation is filed to the Chief Minister and the consideration is sought by the 1st respondent.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the 1st respondent and the 1st respondent shall consider the representation in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to both sides.

The Writ Petition is disposed of without any observation on merits, which shall be decided by the 1st respondent, in accordance with law.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj