High Court of KeralaWP(C)/161/2015disposed of

Mujeeb Rahman v. The Deputy Tahasildar (Inspection)

2015-10-08Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/16TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 161 of 2015 (U) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- MUJEEB RAHMAN S/O.ABDUL RAZACK, AGED 30 YEARS, PEEDIKATHAZHATH, KANJAR, UDAYATHUR VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI (OWNER OF A LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO.KL-36-5056) BY ADVS.SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ SRI.A.M.ABDULLA SRI.O.M.SAJAYAN SRI.K.S.DHANESH KUMAR SRI.K.S.SREENATH SMT.RESHMA P.JOSEPH SMT.SUBI K SRI.P.MOHAMED SABAH RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- THE DEPUTY TAHASILDAR (INSPECTION), TALUK OFFICE, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 702. R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ KUNJACHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 161 of 2015 (U) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE SEIZURE MAHAZAR DATED 18.12.2014 PREPARED BY THE RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF THE GO(MS) NO.20/14/1D DATED 12.2.2014 ISSUED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, INDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA.

EXHIBIT-P3:TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 7.4.2014 IN WPC NO.8183 OF 2014 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

EXHIBIT-P4: TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 7.10.2014 IN WPC NO.25846 OF 2014 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.161 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of October, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner submits that he has got release of the vehicle on payment of Rs.25,000/-. He expresses his intention to compound the offence.

2. Therefore considering that the petitioner has compounded the offence, treating the amount already paid as compounding fee, all further proceedings shall be dropped and a report shall be filed before the competent jurisdictional Magistrate regarding compounding the offence, if any crime is registered.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE