Chandana Rajendran v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/30TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 359 of 2015 (T) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
--------------
1. CHANDANA RAJENDRAN, AGED 37 YEARS, STUDENTS CLASS VIII, GOVERNMENT GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, CHERTHALA (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER MRS.SANDHYA RAJENDRAN, W/O.RAJENDRAN, VASUDEVA BHAVANAM, PALLIPURAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 541.
2. ANJANA D., D/O.DILEEP KUMAR, STUDENT CLASS X, GOVERNMENT GIRLS HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, CHERTHALA (MINOR), REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER MRS.ANITHA DILEEP, W/O.DILEEP KUMAR, PRATHEEKSHA, VARANAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688 539.
BY ADVS.SRI.KURIAN ANTONY EDASSERY SMT.ANN EMIL JOSEPH SRI.BOSE K.THACHIL SRI.M.RETHEESH RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTD BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
....2
-2-
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
3. THE REVENUE SUB-DISTRICT LEVEL APPEAL COMMITTEE CHERTHALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALAPPUZHA-688 539. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANITHA RAVINDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 359 of 2015 (T) -------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ EXT.P1.A TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PART OF THE MANUAL OF KERALA STATE SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM.
EXT.P2.A TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER ON BEHALF OF HER TEAM DATED 4/12/2014. EXT.P3.A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.A5/9270/14 DATED 27/12/2014.
EXT.P4.A TRUE COPIES OF THE SNAP SHOT SHOWING THE STAGE AT THE TIME OF PERFORMANCE OF THE PETITONERS DATED 4/12/2014.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------
K. HARILAL, J.
------------------------------------------------------ W.P. (c) No. 359 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of January, 2015
JUDGMENT
There is no representation for the petitioners. The learned Government Pleader submits that the interim order granted in this writ petition served the purpose of the writ petition and now it has become infructuous. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- (K. HARILAL, JUDGE) Nan/ //true copy// P.S. to Judge