← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/3521/2011dismissed

Prakash v. The Director Of Mining & Geology

2015-07-16Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2015/25TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 3521 of 2011 (M) PETITIONER:

PRAKASH ,S/O.GOPALAN, AGED 27 VATTATHOYIL HOUSE, KOTHAMANGALAM.

BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJESH RESPONDENTS:

1.

THE DIRECTOR OF MINING & GEOLOGY DIRECTORATE OF MINING & GEOLOGY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001 2.

DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN 23 3.

CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM COCHIN-23 4.

THE TAHSILDAR, KOTHAMANGALAM, REVENUE TOWER, KOTHAMANGALAM-686 691. 5.

VAREPETTY GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, VARAPETTY 686 691.

6.

DYSP MUVATTUPUZHA DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE NEAR POLICE STATION MUVATTUPUZHA 686 663.

7.

REGI, PARACKAL HOUSE, ENANELLOR PO, KALAMPORE MUVATTUPUZHA 686 662.

8.

SHAJI N, NADUVELIKUDY HOUSE, MUDAKKUZHA PO PERUMBAVOOR 686 672.

BY ADV. SMT.JISHAMOL CLEETUS, CGC FOR R1 GOVT. PLEADER SRI.MANOJ P. KUNJACHAN, FOR R2 TO R4 & R6 SRI.T.P.M.IBRAHIM KHAN,ASST.S.G OF INDIA FOR R3 THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16.7.2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: [P.T.O]

WP(C).No. 3521 of 2011 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: A TRUE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THE CRACKED WALLS OF PETITIONER'S BUILDING EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE RESIDENTS OF THE LOCALITY BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 22.09.2010 EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

Nil // True copy / / PA to JUDGE PtK/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.3521 of 2011 - M ====================== Dated this the 16th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner had challenged the illegal blasting of rocks by respondents 7 and 8 and the inaction of the respondents 2 to 6 to take action against them. The writ petition itself was filed in the year 2011 and no steps were taken despite notice having been ordered.

In such circumstance, nothing survives in the writ petition and the writ petition would stand dismissed. Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.