Babu C.George v. Kerala State Electricity Board Limited
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/23RD POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 782 of 2015 (W) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER:
-------------------------- BABU C.GEORGE, AGED 69 YEARS MANAGING PARTNER, BCG GOLDEN ORCHID, 5TH FLOOR BCG ESTTES, N.H.BYEPASS, PALARIVATTOM.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN SMT.P.B.WAHIDA RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 004.
2. ASSISTANT ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SECTION KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED, KALOOR ERNAKULAM-682 017.
3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.
ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, PALARIVATTOM ERNAKULAM-682 025.
4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD.
ELECTRICAL DIVISION, ERNAKULAM-682 035.
5. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LIMITED ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM-682 035.
BY SRI. JAICE JACOB, SC, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 782 of 2015 (W) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 :
COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD.2.7.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
P2 :
COPY OF THE RECEIPT DTD.10.7.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P3 :
COPY OF THE ESTIMATE REPORT PREPARED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT. P4 :
COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL INVOICE DTD.31.7.2014. P4(a) : COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL BILL DTD.31.7.2014. P5 :
COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD.9.10.2014 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE
V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 782 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of January, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is subsequently in receipt of the final bill in continuation of Ext. P4 series provisional bills. The petitioner intends to challenge the final bill appropriately. The writ petition is hence dismissed as withdrawn in the circumstances. This will be without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to impugn the provisional and final bills as indicated above.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE