High Court of KeralaWP(C)/963/2015dismissed as withdrawn

Soudamini v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2015-01-30Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/10TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 963 of 2015 (U) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- SOUDAMINI, AGED 56 YEARS, D/O.PASHANNA, KARUKKAMPARA, KIZHAKKUMPURAM, KONGAD P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SMT.P.G.BABITHA RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE RDO, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD - 678 001.

2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, VILLAGE OFFICE, KUZHALMANNAM II VILLAGE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT - 678 701.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 963 of 2015 (u) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION CERTIFICATE IN RESPECT OF THE PETITIONER'S PROPERTY.

EXHIBIT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 08.05.2008 IN RESPECT OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED ON 04.01.2011 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P4. TRUE COPY OF THE COVERING LETTER DATED 04.01.2011. EXHIBIT P5. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)NO.8319/2011. EXHIBIT P6. TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE 1ST AND 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 09.12.2011.

EXHIBIT P7. TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 04.01.2012.

EXHIBIT P8. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CONTEMPT CASE (CIVIL) NO.1130/2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C) No. 963 of 2015 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 30th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned Government Pleader submits that the property concerned has been described as 'nilam' both in the BTR and the 'Data Bank Register' and as such, the application preferred by the petitioner under the Kerala Land Utilization Order is not liable to be entertained.

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks for permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

Permission is granted.

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd