High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1306/2014closed

Ramachandran v. Jagadamma

2015-12-18Honourable Mr.Justice A.M.Shaffique,Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 1306 of 2014 (K) --------------------------- PETITIONERS:

----------- RAMACHANDRAN AGED 72 YEARS S/O. KUNJUKRISHNAN, NO. 356/KDM III 'USHUS' PANAYIL HOUSE, NEAR PYF LIBRARY, KADINAMKULAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.PHILIP J.VETTICKATTU SRI.B.PREMNATH (E) RESPONDENTS:

-----------

1. JAGADAMMA D/O. MEENAKSHI AMMA, PANAYIL HOUSE, KADINAMKULAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 301.

2. CHELLAPPAN, PANAYIL HOUSE, KADINAMKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 301

3. SOMAN NAIR PANAYIL HOUSE, KADINAMKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 301

4. MAYA PANAYIL HOUSE, KADINAMKULAM, THRIUVANANTHAPURAM. 695 301

5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADINAMKULAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R5 SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 1306 of 2014 (K) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 4-8-2012 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 17-12-2012 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINAT DATED 3-11-13 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINAT DATED 8-1-14 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------- NIL TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * W.P.C.No.1306 of 2014 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 18th day of December 2015

J U D G M E N T

Shaffique, J This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking police protection. It is alleged that respondents 1 to 4 are threatening the petitioner with dire consequences. 2.

The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, would submit that during the pendency of the writ petition, no untoward incident has been reported.

Hence we close this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the police, if there is any further cause of action. (sd/-) (ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE) (sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) True Copy PA to Judge jsr19/12/2015