← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1137/2015disposed of

Ninan.P.Thomas v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Pathanamthitta

2015-01-13Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/23RD POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1137 of 2015 (N) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

---------------------- NINAN.P.THOMAS,S/O.P.N.THOMAS, PUTHENPURAYIL, NEDUMON.P.O., EZHAMKULAM.

BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS RESPONDENT :

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 645 BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).NO.1137/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION ALONG WITH THE PROPOSED SET OF TIMING DATED 26/11/2014.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.1137 of 2015 - N ====================== Dated this the 13th day of January, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner in the above writ petition is a regular stage carriage permit holder operating vehicle bearing registration No. KL-26/C-9070 in the route Enathu - Padam. The timings of the service was last alloted on 10.02.2003, hence the petitioner filed an application to revise the timings by Ext.P1 dated 26.11.2014. The petitioner prays for an expeditious consideration of his application. If Ext.P1 application has been received in original in the office of the respondent, the respondent shall within one week of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, display public notice in the notice board of the office of the respondent and shall then consider the prayer of the petitioner, in accordance with law, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of publication of the above notice. Needless to say

W.P.(C) No.1137 of 2015 - N the petitioner and any other rival operator who objects to the revision shall be heard before such consideration. The revision if made shall also be subject to any further revision made as per D3 Circular.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.