High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1157/2015dismissed

Rahul Rajan v. General Convener

2015-01-14Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/24TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1157 of 2015 (T) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- RAHUL RAJAN, S/O.RAJAN, AGED 17 YEARS, KELAMKANDATH HOUSE, PALUVAY P.O, GURUVAYUR THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER PRAMEELA RAJAN.

BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. GENERAL CONVENER STATE YOUTH FESTIVAL DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THRISSUR-680001.

3. CHAIRMAN, APPEAL COMMITTEE THRISSUR DISTRICT KERALA SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM, THRISSUR-680001.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 1157 of 2015 (T) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 8/12/2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.1157 of 2015 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 14 th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner's team participated in the event 'Arabanamuttu' in the District Level School Kalolsavam and could secured only A Grade. The appeal filed was rejected by the Appeal Committee as per Ext.P1 order without considering the contention that the performance was affected by the defective lighting system and hence the writ petition.

2. The learned Government Pleader submits on instructions that, there is no pith of substance in the contentions raised. It is stated that the petitioner got only the 3rd place and that all the judges had awarded only lesser marks to the petitioner. The allegation, if at all any, with regard to the defective stage was applicable to all participants and there was no such report from the stage manager.

3. After going through the pleadings and proceedings and the submissions of the learned Government Pleader, this

W.P.(C) No.1157 of 2015 Court finds that the petitioner has not established any tenable ground to call for interference. Accordingly, interference is declined and the writ petition is dismissed.

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE sj