Aboobacker Siddik v. The Land Tribunal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/20TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1163 of 2015 (U) --------------------------- PETITIONER :
------------------ ABOOBACKER SIDDIK, S/O.ALIKUTTY, KALATHINGAL HOUSE, PUTHARIKKAL, P.O.PARAPPANANGADI - 676 103, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF RESPONDENT :
--------------------- THE LAND TRIBUNAL TIRUR - 676 101, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.C. VINCENT THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 1163 of 2015 (U) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:
TRUE COPY OF THE REGISTERED ASSIGNMENT DEED NO.1878/1986 OF PARAPPANANGADI SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE.
EXT.P2:
TRUE COPY OF THE ASSIGNMENT ORDER DATED 25-3-1987 OF PARAPPANANGADI LAND TRIBUNAL.
EXT.P3:
TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 13-12-2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL.
--------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C) No. 1163 of 2015 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dated, this the 9th day of February, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner purchased the leasehold rights over the 6 1⁄2 cents of land comprised in Re.Survey No. 244/5 of Neduva village vide Ext. P1 assignment deed bearing No. 1878 of 1986 of SRO, Parappangadi. Ext. P2 is the assignment order dated 25.03.1987 of the Land Tribunal, whereby the 'jenmom rights' came to be purchased by the petitioner. But the purchase price was omitted to be paid, which came to the notice of the petitioner only recently. It was in the said circumstances that the petitioner moved the respondent by filing Ext. P3 in S.M.No. 3/87 for permission to satisfy the purchase price, including interest, if any. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the only prayer now pressed before this Court is to cause Ext. P3 to be considered within a reasonable time.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
3. Considering the limited extent of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to adjudicate the matter on merits. The Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondent to consider and
W.P.(C) No. 1163 of 2015 : 2 :
pass appropriate orders on Ext. P3, in accordance with law, at the earliest, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with copy of the writ petition before the respondent for further steps.
Sd/- P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd