Jayalakshmi v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/21ST PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1188 of 2015 (W) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- JAYALAKSHMI, AGED 37 YEARS W/O.MANIRAJ, NAGARMUDI DIVISION SEVEN MALLAY K D H VILLAGE, MUNNAR P.O.

IDUKKI-685612.

BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT.

LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2. THE MUNNAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.O.MUNNAR IDUKKI-685612.

3. THE DEVIKULAM BLOCK PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEVIKULAM IDUKKI-685612.

4. THE KANNAN DEVAN HILLS PLANTATION COMPANY PVT.LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, K D H P HOUSE MUNNAR-685612.

5. THE MANAGER ENGINEERING KANNAN DEVAN HILLS PLANTATION COMPANY PVT.LTD. KDHP HOUSE, MUNNAR-685612.

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. T.R. RAJESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 1188 of 2015 (W) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE MUNNAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH DT.20-11-14.

EXT.P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE OWNERSHIP CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE MUNNAR GRAMA PANCHAYATH DT.4-3-2014.

EXT.P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF R3 DT.14-10-14. EXT.P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF R2 WITH TRANSLATION DT.19-11-14.

EXT.P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION BY R5 DT.24-3-2014. EXT.P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF R2 DT.9-12-14. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 1188 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The order of status quo in W.A. Nos. 227, 224, 574 of 2001 or in S.L.P.(Civil).Nos. 5049, 5066 and 5067 of 2007 does not disable the respondents from providing electricity connection to the building of the petitioner if all other procedural formalities are complied with. Similar writ petitions have been disposed of granting identical relief and therefore the respondents are directed to provide electricity connection to the premises of the petitioner within a period of one month.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE