← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1205/2015disposed of

Moosa Haji v. Kerala State Electricity Board

2015-03-13Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/22ND PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1205 of 2015 (A) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ MOOSA HAJI, MUKKATH HOUSE, ALFA TOURIST HOME, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD.

BY ADV. DR.GEORGE ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDHYUTHI BHAVAN PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695014.

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (DISTRIBUTION-NORTH) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VAIDHYUTHI BHAVAN, KOZHIKODE-673011.

3. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, WAYANAD DISTRICT-673 521.

R1-R3 BY ADV. SMT.NAZEEBA.O.H., KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD R BY SRI.JAICE JACOB,SC,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 1205 of 2015 (A) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXT.P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST MADE BY THE PETITIONER FOR REVISION WITH EFFECT FROM 1-4-2002.

EXT.P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD.

EXT.P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE RENT REVISION STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

EXT.P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REMINDER FILED BY THE PETITIONER DT.17-3-2008.

EXT.P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REMINDER DT.13-2-2009.

EXT.P6 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE BOARD ON 19-2-2010. EXT.P7 :

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 26414/13.

EXT.P8 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DT.2-8-14 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P9 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION DT.6-12-14 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 1205 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 13th day of March, 2015

JUDGMENT

The discrepancy exists as regards the date from which the rent has to be enhanced. The building owned by the petitioner is occupied by the first respondent as a tenant. The petitioner has filed Ext.P9 representation seeking to rectify the anomalies. The petitioner in other words seeks revision of rent for the premises in question.

2.

I direct the third respondent to consider Ext.P9 representation with notice to the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd