V.U.Sulaiman v. The K.S.E.B.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/18TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 11423 of 2006 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- V.U. SULAIMAN, METER READER, ELECTRICAL SECTION KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, CHERPLACHERRY PALAKKAD.
BY SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
R3 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC R1-R2 BY ADV. SRI.PULIKOOL ABUBACKER, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO.11423/2006 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
P1 :
COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.22016/2005 ON THE FILE OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 18.08.2005 P2 :
COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.11.2005 P3 :
COPY OF THE BOARD ORDER DATED 23.01.1981 P4 :
COPY OF THE GAZETTE PUBLICATION DATED 13.12.2003 P5 :
COPY OF THE SHORT LIST PUBLISHED DATED 31.03.2006 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: N I L //TRUE COPY P.A. TO JUDGE
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J.
------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.11423 of 2006 ---------------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, who is working as a Meter Reader in Electrical Section at Cherplacherry of the Kerala State Electricity Board, has filed this writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 and 2 to fill up the 10% quota for in-service candidates to the post of Sub Engineer (Electrical) from List II of Ext.P5 only and for other consequential reliefs.
2. By order dated 18.4.2006, this Court granted an interim direction to the effect that vacancies earmarked for recruitment to 10% quota reserved for in-service candidates shall not be filled up from open merit candidates.
3. Today, when the case was taken up for final hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the interim order, no further orders are required and therefore, this writ petition may be closed.
Recording the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed. SD/- ANIL K. NARENDRAN, JUDGE