Haridasan v. Payyannur Municipality Represented By Its Secretary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/13TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1283 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------ PETITIONER : - ---------------------- HARIDASAN, S/O.CHEEYYAYI, PALAKKAVALAPPIL, KUNHIMANGALAM P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN RESPONDENTS : - ---------------------------
1. PAYYANUR MUNICIPALITY , REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.O.PAYYANUR, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN 670307.
2. SECRETARY, PAYYANUR MUNICIPALITY, PO. PAYYANUR, KANNUR DISTRICT PIN 670307.
R1&2 BY ADV. SRI.M.SASINDRAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 1283 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS : - ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1 : TRUE COPY OF REGISTERED SALE DEED NO.377/2009 OF S.R.O. PAYYANUR DATED 27.01.2009 AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION. EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE COPY OF LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 21.02.2014 AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION.
EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION UNDER RULE 5(1) AND RULE 144(1) OF KERALA MUNICIPAL BUILDING RULES FILED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 28.02.2014.
EXHIBIT-P4: TRUE COPY OF SITE PLAN OF THE CONSTRUCTION IN R.S. NO.11/1A OF PAYYANNUR VILLAGE IN PAYYANUR MUNICIPALITY. EXHIBIT-P4(a): TRUE COPY OF BUILDING PLAN IN R.S.NO.104/4 OF PAYYANNUR VILLAGE IN PAYYANNUR MUNICIPALITY.
EXHIBIT-P5: TRUE COPY OF NOTICE BEARING NO.B.A.1024/13-14 DATED 11.04.2014 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT MUNICIPALITY AND ITS ENGLISH TRANSLATION.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : - NIL.
--------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE DMR/-
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P.(c) No. 1283 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 04th day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
In the light of the ratio laid down in Abdul Kabeer v. Malappuram Municipality [2012 (3) KLT 106], the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same lines, applying the ratio laid down by the learned Single Bench in the said decision, thereby quashing Exhibit P5.
Consequently, the second respondent is directed to consider Exhibit P3 application of the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU JUDGE DMR/-