T.S.Babu v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/17TH BHADRA, 1937 O.P.No.28511 of 2000 (T) -------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):- -------------------------- T.S.BABU, S/O.SUDHAKARAN, THOPPIL HOUSE, OKKAL PO., PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON ABRAHAM.

RESPONDENT(S):- ---------------------------- 1.

THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2.

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3.

THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KOTHAMANGALAM.

4.

T.V.VIJAYAN, PRESIDENT, S.N.D.P. BRANCH, OKKAL, PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

R1 TO R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.R.RAJESH. R4 BY ADV. SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J.

THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

K. Vinod Chandran, J ------------------------------------- O.P.No.28511 of 2000-T ------------------------------------ Dated this the 08th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

Read order dated 25.10.2000 in C.M.P.No.47911 of 2000: "This is a petition for stay of operation of Ext.P6 order dated 8.9.2000. By Ext.P6 order the District Educational Officer has directed the S.N.D.P. Branch to elect a manager as per rules and School bye-law, within a period of six months from the date of the order. By Ext.P6 order approval is also granted for change of management provisionally in favour of Shri.T.V.Vijayan, who is the fourth respondent in the Original Petition. The fourth respondent has filed a detailed counter affidavit and he has produced the order of the Civil Court as Ext.R4(f). It is stated in Ext.R4(f) that the matter has been settled by the S.N.D.P. Union and the petitioner's management is terminated. In the light of the finding of the Civil Court, I do not find any reason to continue the stay. Stay petition is therefore dismissed".

2. In view of the above order and in the light of the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent that the term of the Manager was for a specific period, the Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.

vku/- [ true copy ]