Institute Of Technology v. Kannur University & Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/30TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 5631 of 2009 (Y) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- THE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MAYYIL, PAVANNURMOTTA PO, KANNUR DISTRICT KERALA 670 602 REPRESENTED BY ITS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER K.P.RAMAKRISHNA KURUP.

BY ADVS.SRI.N.MANOJ KUMAR SMT.JAYASREE MANOJ RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. THE KANNUR UNIVERSITY MANGATTUPARAMBA, KANNUR UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PO. KANNUR 670 567, REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR.

2. THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS KANNUR UNIVERSITY, MANGATTUPARAMBA KANNUR UNIVERSITY CAMPUS PO. KANNUR 670 567.

3. THE ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION, 7TH FLOOR, CHANDER LOK BUILDING JANPATH, NEW DELHI 110 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

R,R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.M.SASEENDRAN,SC,KANNUR UNIVERSITY R,R3 BY ADV. SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI R,R3 BY ADV. SRI.S.KRISHNAMURTHY,SC, AICTE R BY SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI - R3 R BY ADV. S. KRISHNAMOORTHY, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 5631 of 2009 (Y) APPENDIX PETITIONERS EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1 COPY OF THE APPLICATION.

EXT.P2 COPY OF THE ORDER DTD. 14.8.08.

EXT.P3 COPY OF THE LETTER DTD.18.09.08 EXT.P4 COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 4.11.08.

EXT.P5 COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 5.11.08.

EXT.P6 COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 7.11.08.

EXT.P7 COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 26.11.08.

EXT.P8 COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION EXT.P9 COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 7.2.09.

EXT.P10 COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 13.2.09.

EXT.P11 COPY OF THE LETTER DTD. 13.2.09.

RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS:

NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A to Judge SB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.5631 of 2009 - Y ====================== Dated this the 19th day of February, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner had filed the above writ petition seeking affiliation to the M.B.A course from the respondent University. The petitioner was granted a provisional affiliation by order dated 23.10.2009. In the subsequent year also the petitioner was granted such provisional affiliation.

In such circumstance, nothing survives in the writ petition. Leaving open the contentions of the petitioners with respect to the affiliation, the writ petition would stand closed.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge