High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1398/2015dismissed

Aravind V. v. The Director, Department Of General Education

2015-01-16Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1398 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------- PETITIONER :

--------------------- ARAVIND V., AGED 17 YEARS PLUS TWO STUDENT, N.S.S.H.S.S. PERUNNA REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER, P.C.VIJAYAKUMAR, SREELAYAM MALAKUNNAM P.O., ITHITHANAM, CHANGANASSERY.

BY ADVS.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP SRI.P.K.SATHEESH KUMAR RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2. THE CHAIRMAN APPEAL COMMITTEE KOTTAYAM, REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2014-15 OFFICE OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION KOTTAYAM-686002.

R1 & R2 BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. JOSEPH GEORGE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 1398 of 2015 (Y) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.12.2014 TAKEN IN THE PETITIONER'S APPEAL.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL --------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

======================== W.P.(C). No. 1398 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner participated in the event 'Mrudangam' in the District Level School Kalolsavam and could secure only the third place with A Grade. The appeal was rejected by the Appeal Committee as per Ext.P1 order allegedly without considering the contention that the judgment was defective and hence the writ petition.

2. The learned Government Pleader submits on instructions that, there is no pith of substance in the contentions raised. The video has been viewed and there was no such report from the stage manager.

3. After going through the pleadings and proceedings and the submissions of the learned Government Pleader, this Court finds that the petitioner has not established any tenable ground to call for interference. Accordingly, interference is declined and the writ petition is dismissed.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

kp/-