Dona Sajith (Minor) v. The Deputy Director Of Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH 2015/12TH PHALGUNA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1548 of 2015 (P) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- DONA SAJITH (MINOR) REPRESENTED HEREIN BY HER GUARDIAN FATHER SAJITH S/O. DEVASSIA, AGED 51 YEARS RESIDING AT POVAN HOUSE PAYYAMPALLY P.O., WAYANAD - 670 646.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON SRI.P.S.APPU RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION WAYANAD (CHAIRMAN, APPEAL COMMITTEE REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2014-15) PIN - 670 646.
2. THE CONVENER PROGRAMME COMMITTEE REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM 2014-15 WAYANAD - 670 646.
3. THE DISTRICT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.K.SAIDALAVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 1548 of 2015 (P) --------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER DT. 08.1.15.
P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT ISSUED TO SNEHA THOMAS DT. 08.1.15.
P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT ISSUED TO NITHYA JOHN DT. 08.1.15.
P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT ISSUED TO HARSHA JOY DT. 08.1.15.
P5 - RUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT ISSUED TO MALAVIKA SOORAJ DT. 08.1.15.
P6 - TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT ISSUED TO SREELAKSHMI K.U DT. 08.1.15.
P7 - TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF MERIT ISSUED TO MRUDHULA SAJEEVAN DT. 08.1.15.
P8 - TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 09.1.15. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS - NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.
--------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.1548 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of March, 2015
JUDGMENT
When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the very purpose sought for by the accused by the filing of the writ petition is over and therefore, no further orders are required. Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed.
Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE