Anjusha (Minor) Represented By Her Father Krishnakumar v. Deputy Director Of Education
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/25TH POUSHA, 1936 --------------------------- PETITIONERS :
------------------
1. ANJUSHA G.K., AGED 50 YEARS, D/O.K.KRISHNA KUMAR, RESIDING AT NANADANM NEDUMBRAM P.O., TIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN KRISHNAKUMAR, RESIDING AT NANDANAM, NEDUMBRABM P.O., TIRUVALLA.
2. APARNA A.KUMAR, AGED 16 YEARS, D/O.AMBIKA, ERAMATH HOUSE, KAVUMBHAGOM, TIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, AMBIKA ERAMATH HOUSE, KAVUMBHAGOM, TIRUVALLA.
3. RESHMA RAMACHANDRAN,D/O.JAYASREE, AGED 16 YEARS, RESIDING AT PLANTHARAYIL HOUSE, VENPALA P.O.,THIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY THE MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN JAYASREE RESIDING AT PLANTHARAYIL HOUSE, VENPALA P.O., THIRUVALLA.
4. SIDHI SUNIL,D/O.VINI SUNIL, AGED 16 YEARS, KIZHAKKETHIL HOUSE, VENPALA P.O., THIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY TE MOTHER AD NATURAL GUARDINA VINI SUNIL KIZHAKKETHIL HOUSE, VENPALA P.O., THIRUVALLA.
5. VINAYA JAYARAM, D/O.AMBIKA JAYARAM,AGED 16 YEARS, RESIDING AT EDAKKULANJI PADINJARETHIL, THOLASSERI THIRUVALLA, REPRESENTED BY THE MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN AMBIKA JAYARAM RESIDING AT EDAKKULANJI PADINJARETHIL.
6. LIBINA GEORGE, AGED 16 YEARS, D/O.SALAMMA GEORGE, RESIDING AT KARUKAYYIL HOUSE, KOYILMUKKU, PANDANKARI P.O., THIRUVILLA REPRESENTED BY THE MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SALAMMA GEORGE RESIDING AT KARUKAYIL HOUSE, KOYILMUKKU PANDANKARI.P.O., THIRUVALLA.
7. SHEEBA MARY KURIAN, D/O.BIJI KURIAN PANDISSERI HOUSE, KUTTOOR P.O., THIRUVALLA REPRESENTED BY THE MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN BIJI KURIAN, PANDISSERI HOUSE, KUTTOOR P.O.
TIRUVALLA.
8. ANU THOMAS, D/O.RAJAN THOMAS, AGED 16 YEARS, PANACKAMATTOM HOUSE, NIRANAM P.O., TIRUVALLA REPRESENTED BY FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN RAJAN THOMAS, PANACKAMATTOM HOUSE, NIRANAM P.O., TIRUVALLA.
9. NIDHI SABU, AGED 16 YEARS, TIRUVALLA, D/O.CHACHIKUTTY, OTTATHIL HOUSE, WEST OTHARA P.O., TIRUVALLA REPRESENTED BY MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN CHACHIKUTTY OTTATHIL HOUSE, WEST OTHARA P .O., TIRUVALLA.
10. SHEEBA THOMAS, AGED 16 YEARS, D/O.THOMAS, KOTTARATHIL HOUSE, MEPRAL P.O., THRIVALLA REPRESENTED BY FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN THOMAS KOTTARATHIL HOUSE, MEPRAL P.O., THRIVALLA.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.N.RADHAKRISHNAN(THIRUVALLA) SRI.CIRIL.T.EAPEN RESPONDENTS :
---------------------
1. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PATHANAMTHITTA AT THIRUVALLA PIN- 689645
2. CONVENOR, PATHANAMTHITTA REVENUE DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM-2014-15, TIRUVALLA (DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, TIRUVALLA)
3. STATE CONVENOR, STATE SCHOOL KALOLSAAM 2014-15, KOZHIKODE.
BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. MUHAMMED SHAFI M. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
--------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:
TRUE COPY FO THE ORDER NO.C47740/14 IN APPEAL NO.50 DATED 12.01.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :
NIL.
--------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE bp
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
.............................................................................. W.P.(C)1570 OF 2015 ......................................................................... Dated this the 15th January, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioners were members of the team for the event 'Oppana' in the Pathanamthitta Revenue District School Kalolsavam, 2014-15. The case of the petitioners is that on completion of the event, their performance was not properly appreciated, as a result of which they were denied the top position, virtually disabling them from competing in the State Kalolsavam, 2015. Even though an appeal was filed, the same came to be rejected as per Ext.P1 order. The main ground of challenge in the appeal was that the sound system was defective.
2. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that absolutely no reason is stated in Ext.P1 order, particularly with regard to the grounds raised in the appeal.
3. The learned Government Pleader, on instruction, submits that there is absolutely no merit or bonafides in the plea raised from the part of the petitioner . It is added that no technical defect or mistake was reported at any point of time . That apart, there is a substantial difference of '6' marks between the
W.P.(C)1570 OF 2015 petitioners' team and the first prize winners' team. This Court does not find any reason to call for interference. The writ petition is dismissed. P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE lk