Sreeja V.K. v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/29TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1591 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------------
1. SREEJA V.K.
W/O. HARIDASAN, PUTHIYAPARAMBATH, SANKARANELLUR P.O. THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT.
2. C.N.SADHIQUE, AGED 48 YEARS S/O. ABOOHAJI, KEYEES, PADUVILAYI AMSOM VENGAD DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.P.R.SREEJITH SRI.K.V.MANOJ KUMAR SRI.M.PROMODH KUMAR SMT.MAYA CHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, CIVIL STATION KANNUR-670 001.
2. REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CIVIL STATION KANNUR-670 001.
3. VIJAYAN N.P.
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) KALATHIKANDIL HOUSE, KUTHIYANGA P.O., THALASSERY KANNUR DISTRICT-670 101.
R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 1591 of 2015 (Y) ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 :
COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION OF KL/58/C-9720 OF THE 1ST PETITIONER.
EXT.P2 :
COPY OF THE STAGE CARRIAGE PERMIT FOR EXT.P1 VEHICLE KL/58/C-9720.
EXT.P3 :
COPY OF TIMINGS OF THE EARLIER STAGE CARRIAGE VEHICLE NO.KL/13/P-6233, THE TIME SHEET PERTAINS TO EXT.P2 PERMIT. EXT.P4 :
COPY OF THE 2ND PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT DTD.12.6.2014 WITH THE 1ST PETITIONER FOR PURCHASE OF STAGE CARRIAGE VEHICLE COVERED BY EXT.P1 AND P2.
EXT.P5 :
COPY OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT'S ORDER DTD.8.10.2013 SANCTIONING A REVISED SET OF TIMINGS FOR KL/58D-3141 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:
NIL --------------------------------------- // TRUE COPY // P.A TO JUDGE.
SB
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
===================== W.P.(C) No.1591 of 2015 - Y ====================== Dated this the 19th day of January, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioners, the rival operators, challenge the timings of the 3rd respondent settled in accordance with the Motor Vehicles Act and Rules. The petitioners if at all aggrieved, would have to avail the statutory remedy of revision before the State Transport Appellate Tribunal. Reserving such liberty, the writ petition would stand dismissed.
Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.