High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1602/2015disposed of

A.M.Ibrahim v. Superintendent Of Police

2015-01-16Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1602 of 2015 (A) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- A.M.IBRAHIM, AGED 71 YEARS, S/O. ABDU RAHIMAN, 33/625, BABY NIVAS, BIG BAZAR, PERINTHALMANNA, PIN-679 322.

BY ADVS.SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH SRI.ARUN MATHEW VADAKKAN RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU, SPECIAL CELL, THONDAYAD, CHEVARAMBALAM P.O., KOZHIKODE-673 017. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MUHAMMED SHAFI M.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 1602 of 2015 (A) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT. P1 : TRUE COPY OF MEMO DTD.9.12.2014 FILED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT IN CRL.MC NO.6828/2014 ALONG WITH THE DOCUMENT PRODUCED ALONG WITH THE MEMO.

EXT. P2 : TRUE COPY OF REPRESENTATION DTD.22.12.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

======================== W.P.(C). No. 1602 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16 th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayer:

"Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 within such short time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to grant."

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the grievance of the petitioner has also been projected by way of Ext.P2 application pending consideration before the respondent and that the petitioner will be satisfied, if a direction is given to the respondent to have it considered and disposed of within a reasonable time.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

3. Considering the limited nature of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case. The writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 application in

W.P.C. No.1602 of 2015 -2accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other affected parties, if any, at the earliest, at any rate, within 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the respondent for further steps.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

kp/-