High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1620/2015disposed of

M.V.Edward v. State Of Kerala

2015-01-16Honourable Mr.Justice P.R.Ramachandra Menon4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1620 of 2015 (B) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- M.V.EDWARD, AGED 59, S/O.M.M.VAREEDKUTTY, MANNAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MARADU.P.O., MARADU VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK.

BY ADV. SRI.P.V.GEORGE(PUTHIYIDAM) RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNOOR TALUK OFFICE, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 011.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MUHAMMED SHAFI.M THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 1620 of 2015 (B) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.2935/99 DATED 20.8.1999 REGISTERED AT SUB-REGISTRAR OFFICE, MARADU.

EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED 2.5.2007 FOR THE PERIOD 2007-2008 ISSUED BY VILLAGE OFFICER, MARADU.

EXHIBIT P3- TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 19.12.2014 SUBMITTED TO 2ND RESPONDENT ON 20.12.2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

- NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE mbr/

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

======================== W.P.(C). No. 1620 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16 th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:

"i. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to measure and demarcate the boundaries of property as per Ext.P3.

ii. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to provide the sketch of property covered by Ext.P1 to the petitioner."

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the grievance of the petitioner has also been projected by way of Ext.P3 nd respondent and application pending consideration before the 2 the prayer is only to cause the same to be considered and disposed of within a reasonable time.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

3. Considering the limited nature of relief sought for, this Court does not find it necessary to go into the merits of the case. nd respondent to The writ petition is disposed of, directing the 2

W.P.C. No. 1620 of 2015 -2consider and finalize Ext.P3 application in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and other interested parties, if any, at the earliest, at any rate, within 'two months' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along nd respondent for with a copy of the writ petition before the 2 further steps.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.

kp/-