← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1644/2015disposed of

M.G. Sadanandan v. Thrissur Corporation

2015-02-04Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/15TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1644 of 2015 (E) --------------------------- PETITIONERS:

----------------

1. M.G. SADANANDAN AGED 45 YEARS S/O.GOPALAN EZHUTHASSAN, MUNDAYOOR VALAPPIL (H) PERAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR.

2. MANJULA V.R.

W/O.M.G.SADANANDAN, MUNDAYOOR VALAPPIL (H) PERAMANGALAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR.

BY ADVS.SRI.P.SANTHOSH (PODUVAL) SMT.R.RAJITHA SRI.K.D.SREEVISAKH RESPONDENTS:

----------------

1. THRISSUR CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE THRISSUR-680001.

2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT THRISSUR CORPORATION OFFICE, THRISSUR-680001. R BY SRI.K.P.VIJAYAN,SC,THRISSUR CORPORATION THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 1644 of 2015 (E) ------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ---------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 6.12.2014 IN FILE NO.KKY/BA.2014-15 ISSUED BY 2NS RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT-P1(A): TRNASLATION OF EXHIBIT-P1.

EXHIBIT-P2: PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS ----------------------------- NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.1644 of 2015 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 4 th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

In the light of the ratio laid down in Nasar P.K. and Others v. Malappuram Municipality (2009(3)KHC 35), the present writ petition is also disposed of on the same lines, applying the ratio laid down by the learned Single Bench in the said decision, thereby quashing Ext.P1.

Consequently, the first respondent is directed to consider the application of the petitioners for building permission afresh, if necessary, by referring the matter to the District Town Planner and thereafter pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE sj