Mohammed v. The Additional Excise Ciommissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WEDNESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 4523 of 2013 (M) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

MOHAMMED, S/O ABDULLA, POOKKATTUTHODI HOUSE, MANALAYA POST, ANAMANGAD, PERINTHALMANNA TLAUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER ABDULLA S/O AHAMMED, POOKATTUTHODI HOUSE, MANALAYA P.O, PERINTHALMANNA, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.BABU S. NAIR SRI.K.RAKESH RESPONDENTS:

1. THE ADDITIONAL EXCISE CIOMMISSIONER (ENFORCEMENT), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE DEPUTY EXCISE COMMISSIONER, MALAPPURAM-676505 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.K.SAIDALAVI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.

------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.4523 of 2013 M -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

None appears for the petitioner. Despite the fact that the writ petition belongs to the year 2013 and that well in advance this Court has notified that the matter would be taken up today, the petitioner has not chosen to appear before the Court to prosecute the case. This Court accordingly holds that the petitioner may not be inclined to pursue the writ petition. As a result, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge tkv