← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1985/2015disposed of

M/S.George And Company v. Assistant Labour Officer

2015-01-20Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/30TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1985 of 2015 (W) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- M/S.GEORGE AND COMPANY, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT S.T.NAGAR, THRISSUR BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR BIJU GEORGE BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH SIVARAMANKUTTY RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER, NEDUMKANDAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685584.

BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

PJ

WP(C).No. 1985 of 2015 (W) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------- P1:

COPY OF THE APPLICATION MADE BY PERMANENT WORKER ANEESH PEETHAMBARAN TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 8/12/14 P2:

COPY OF THE APPLICATION MADE BY PERMANENT WORKER PAVAN EKKA TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 8/12/14 P3:

COPY OF THE APPLICATION MADE BY PERMANENT WORKER ROHIT EKKA TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 8/12/14 P4:

COPY OF THE APPLICATION MADE BY PERMANENT WORKER SUNIL ORAON TO THE RESPONDENT DATED 8/12/14 P5:

COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 7/1/15 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS -------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 1985 of 2015 ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of January, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, an employer, seeks consideration of the applications filed under section 26A of the Kerala Head Load Workers Act and Rules, which are produced at Exts.P1 to P4.

2.

The petitioner seeks to appoint the applicants in Exts.P1 to P4 as the regular Head Load Workers in his establishment.

Since the prayer is confined to consideration, the respondent shall consider the same with due notice as provided in the Act and Rules within a period of four months from the date of production of the certified copy of the judgment.

Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj