High Court of KeralaWP(C)/1989/2015disposed of

Ibrahim Haji v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Malappuram

2015-02-10Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/21ST MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 1989 of 2015 (W) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-----------------------

1. IBRAHIM HAJI, S/O.MOITHEENKUTTY, NEERKATTIL HOUSE, P.O VALAVANNUR, KALPAKANCHERY, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM.

2. FAIZAL T.P., S/O.KUNHEENKUTTY, THALIPARAMBIL HOUSE, P.O. KARIPOL, VETTICHITA , TIRUR, MALAPPURAM.

3. FAIZAL P.P., S/O.MAMMU HAJI, PUTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, PARAMMALANGADI, KALPAKANCHERY, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.SAJU J.VALLYARA RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 676 505.

2. SRI. MOHAMMED KOYA, S/O.KUNHIMOHAMMED, POOVALLOOR HOUSE, KODUR WEST, URDU NAGAR P.O., MALAPPURAM - 676 504.

R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 1989 of 2015 (W) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: PHOTOCOPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE ORDER NO G2/189013/2014/M DATED 05-01-2015.

EXHIBIT P2: PHOTOCOPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 13-01-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHIBIT P3: PHOTOCOPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 06-01-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. EXHBIIT P4: PHOTOCOPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 06-01-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE 3RD PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

----------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.1989 of 2015 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of February, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks for consideration of the objection of the petitioner, when the second respondent's timings are settled. If the Regional Transport Authority has received the objections filed at Ext.P2 to P4, definitely the same shall also be taken into account before the second respondent's timings are settled. The writ petition is disposed of .

K.VINOD CHANDRAN , JUDGE.

rkc.