← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/2115/2015disposed of

A.Mohanan v. The Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

2015-01-21Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2015/1ST MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 2115 of 2015 (L) --------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ A.MOHANAN, PATHAYAKUZHIMALAYIL HOUSE, MAMTHARATHOOR, (VIA) PUTHUPPAMAM, VADAKARA.

BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR OFFICE OF THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPORT BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

2. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION), THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRANSPORT BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 2115 of 2015 (L) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 23/9/2014 EXHIBIT P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE NEWSPAPER REPORT DATED 1/10/2014 PUBLISHED IN DESABHIMANI DAILY IN ITS CALICUT EDITION EXHIBIT P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14/10/2014.

EXHIBIT P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 28/9/2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 11/12/2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 2115 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 21st day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks a retransfer to his home station on the ground that he is to retire shortly on 30.06.2015. The fact that the wife of the petitioner is ill is another reason added to support the plea of transfer.

2.

The petitioner has in this regard submitted Ext.P5 representation with the second respondent. It is for the second respondent to consider whether a suitable posting could be given to the petitioner even during the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings.

3.

I direct the second respondent to consider Ext.P5 representation with notice to the petitioner. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd